Why did Wiz reject $23B from Google and how did they get $32B?
Wiz rejected Google's $23B acquisition offer in 2024 by announcing credible IPO plans. Nine months later, Google returned with a $32B offer. 38% higher. and Wiz accepted. The IPO path wasn't the goal. It was the negotiating lever. By creating a real walk-away option, Wiz forced Google to price the r
Context: A founder in or approaching an acquisition process, trying to understand how to build leverage and extract a higher price from a buyer.
Wiz rejected Google's $23B acquisition offer in 2024 by announcing credible IPO plans. Nine months later, Google returned with a $32B offer. 38% higher. and Wiz accepted. The IPO path wasn't the goal. It was the negotiating lever. By creating a real walk-away option, Wiz forced Google to price the risk of losing the deal entirely.
--
The Full Story
In summer 2024, Google made an offer to acquire Wiz, the cloud security company, for $23 billion. At the time, Wiz had hit $100M ARR in 18 months. one of the fastest software growth rates on record. The founders said no and publicly announced they were targeting an IPO instead.
Most people read that as ambition. It was actually strategy.
The Wiz founders (Assaf Rappaport, Roy Reznik, Yinon Costica, Ami Luttwak) had done this before. Their previous company, Adallom, was acquired by Microsoft for $320M in 2015. They understood acquisition process dynamics.
When Wiz turned down $23B, they weren't gambling. They were manufacturing leverage. The credible IPO path made Google's next move binary: either come back at a number that made the deal undeniable, or watch Wiz go public and lose access to the company permanently.
Google came back. March 11, 2026: $32B all-cash. A $3.2B reverse break fee included. Google's insurance against regulatory risk.
The deal closed. Wiz became the largest cybersecurity acquisition in history.
--
What founders can learn from this
1. The first offer is usually not the best offer. but only if you have a real alternative.
2. The alternative has to be credible. A fake IPO threat doesn't work. A funded IPO roadmap does.
3. Leverage disappears the moment the buyer believes you need the deal more than they do.
4. Serial founders negotiate better because they've seen how acquisition timelines actually work. First-time founders often interpret urgency signals wrong and close too fast.
Most M&A processes give buyers more information and more time than sellers. The exception is when the seller has a real competing option. That's when the leverage inverts.
--
Related Questions
- How do you negotiate an acquisition offer as a founder?
- What is a reverse break fee in an acquisition?
- Should I pursue an IPO or acquisition for my company?
- How do I know if I'm getting a fair acquisition offer?
--
Ask ExitBoard
Evaluating an acquisition offer? The ExitBoard Founder Clarity Session is built for this exact scenario. Book a session to get independent advisory on your exit options before you respond to any offer.
--
Source brief task: 86bbw6wdz Ready for: Dev handoff to ExitBoard Lovable build + SEO review
Have a question about your business?
Get a personalized, cited answer from Jason based on 117+ nine-figure founder & investor conversations, free.
Related questions
- What are the most common mistakes founders make when exiting their business?Founders frequently undermine their exit value by failing to prepare adequately, neglecting their intellectual property, and not building early relationships with potential acquirers. Additionally, strategic drift and a lack of core business focus can significantly deter buyers and complicate a successful sale.
- How can a founder successfully sell their company when facing limited cash runway?Selling a company with limited runway requires a highly focused, aggressive strategy targeting strategic buyers who can immediately leverage your assets. Prioritize deal certainty and speed over maximizing valuation, emphasizing the 'buy vs. build' advantage you offer to accelerate a critical strategic objective for the acquirer.
- How should a founder structure an earnout so it actually pays out?Most earnouts fail because founders agree to metrics they can't control after the acquisition closes. To maximize your chances of seeing that money, keep the earnout short (12–18 months), tie targets only to the business unit you directly manage, and negotiate the resources and autonomy you need into the deal documents before signing.
- What common mistakes do founders make immediately after selling their company?Founders frequently err post-exit by underestimating the emotional identity shift, mismanaging new wealth without proper financial planning, failing to understand retention package complexities, and neglecting pre-sale issues that can impact earn-outs and integration.
- What are earnouts in an acquisition deal and should founders avoid them?An earnout is money the buyer pays you after closing, only if you hit future performance targets. Founders should treat earnouts as money they will never see — because nine out of ten fail — and negotiate to maximize cash at close instead.